The US media projected DPM as punitive action against the police for perceived misconduct and an expression of concern for the right to life of blacks. Proponents of DPM thus argue that police are incapable of changing and more resources do not guarantee good policing. However, a study of more than 2,000 officers published in 2017 found that the cameras failed to deter use of excessive force. The 2014 shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri led to body cameras being made mandatory for police officers. More resources do not guarantee good policing. DPM resulted in a cut of $870 million in the police budgets of more than 20 US cities. On average, 1,000 people are killed by police every year. The country spends about $100bn on policing. Since 1990, US police have received excess military equipment worth $6 billion. Its advocates argue that police reforms have failed to deter police from excessive use of force against citizens and therefore resources should be reallocated to sectors that contribute to crime.

DPM gained traction worldwide, giving rise to interesting questions: is defunding possible? Is the police not important for maintaining order and keeping communities safe? Is the campaign an attempt to make police more accountable?ĭPM calls for divesting funds from police departments and reallocating them to alternative models based on community-centric approaches, ie education, healthcare, restorative justice, employment programmes and community development.ĭPM perceives policing as a tool for maintaining racial supremacy. THE killing of George Floyd in the US marked the beginning of the ‘Defund the police’ movement.

Dawn of war resolution mod